Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Systematic Reviews

This guide describes all steps involved in the conduct of a systematic review

Formulate clear research question(s)

Systematic reviews should set clear questions, the answers to which will provide meaningful information that can be used to guide decision-making. These should be stated clearly and precisely in the protocol.

Questions may be extremely specific or very broad, although if broad, it may be more appropriate to break this down into a series of related more specific questions. 

Aids to formulate clear question(s): 

  • Science is an iterative process: conducting a scoping search will help to answer any background questions. This knowledge will help to focus the clear still unanswered (foreground) questions
  • Structure your query by dividing it into searchable concepts (i.e. make use of a query model like PICO)
  • Make use of an experienced information specialist to help formulate questions.  

More detailed information on preparation:  Chapter 1.1 'Getting Started'  in: Systematic Reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care

Write and register a protocol

The importance of a prospectively registered protocol

Prospectively registering a protocol of a systematic review reduces duplication of effort, research waste, and promotes accountability:

Publication of a protocol for a review that is written without knowledge of the available studies reduces the impact of review authors’ biases, promotes transparency of methods and processes, reduces the potential for duplication, allows peer review of the planned methods before they have been completed, and offers an opportunity for the review team to plan resources and logistics for undertaking the review itself.”

(Source: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review Interventions, Version 6.3,2022: Section 1-5) 

Guidance

General Guidance tools Description
PRISMA-S checklist Protocol framework guidance
Template Joanna Briggs Institute MS Word template for creating a protocol

 

Where to register

Depending on the type of (systematic) review, there are different places where and how to register a protocol:

Registry Description Help
Prospero (the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) Systematic reviews, rapid reviews, umbrella reviews Help with registration
Cochrane Reviews A Cochrane Protocol is a description of the proposed approach for a Cochrane Review, outlining the question and the methods for assessing and analysing studies. Cochrane Reviews and Protocols are prepared by author teams, who may be supported by a topic-based Cochrane Review Group. Template for protocols
Journal Systematic Reviews The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols.
Systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. 
Submission Guidelines
JMIR Research Protocol Ongoing trials, grant proposals, methods Help Center
Open Science Framework (OSF) free, open collaboration platform for research outputs: projects, data, and other material
VU-license
Help with registration
Figshare Repository for all research outputs. AUMC-license